Mann Paper: Pause Was Not Foreseeable

The global warming pause, or slowdown, seen earlier this century was not predictable, concludes a paper by climate scientist Michael Mann and colleagues. This image from the pap[er shows the estimated pattern of multidecadal internal variability in (top) Pacific and (bottom) Atlantic sea surface temperatures. The Pacific pattern is not found to be predictable in advance on decadal and longer timescales, whereas the Atlantic pattern does exhibit some predictability on these timescales. Courtesy: Mann et al and Geophysical Research Letters.The global warming pause, or slowdown, seen earlier this century was not predictable, concludes a paper by climate scientist Michael Mann and colleagues. This image from the pap[er shows the estimated pattern of multidecadal internal variability in (top) Pacific and (bottom) Atlantic sea surface temperatures. The Pacific pattern is not found to be predictable in advance on decadal and longer timescales, whereas the Atlantic pattern does exhibit some predictability on these timescales. Courtesy: Mann et al and Geophysical Research Letters.

Paper from climate scientist Michael Mann and colleagues asks whether the recent slowdown, or pause as some refer to it, in global warming was predictable? They conclude that the “temporary slowdown in large-scale surface warming” earlier this century could not have been foreseen by statistical forecasting methods.

by Terri Cook, American Geophysical Union 

From the early 2000s to the early 2010s, there was a temporary slowdown in the large-scale warming of Earth’s surface. Recent studies have ascribed this slowing to both internal sources of climatic variability—such as cool La Niña conditions and stronger trade winds in the Pacific—and external influences, including the cooling effects of volcanic and human-made particulates in the atmosphere.Several studies have suggested that climate models could have predicted this slowdown and the subsequent recovery several years ahead of time—implying that the models can accurately account for mechanisms that regulate decadal and interdecadal variability in the planet’s temperature.

To test this hypothesis, Mann et al. – a paper in Geophysical Research Letters – combined estimates of the Northern Hemisphere’s internal climate variability with hindcasting, a statistical method that uses data from past events to compare modeling projections with the already observed outcomes.The team’s analyses indicate that statistical methods could not have forecast the recent deceleration in surface warming because they can’t accurately predict the internal variability in the North Pacific Ocean, which played a crucial role in the slowdown. In contrast, a multidecadal signal in the North Atlantic does appear to have been predictable.

According to their results, however, its much smaller signal means it will have little influence on Northern Hemisphere temperatures over the next 1 to 2 decades.This minor signal in the North Atlantic is consistent with previous studies that have identified a regional 50- to 70-year oscillation, which played a more important role in controlling Northern Hemisphere temperatures in the middle of the 20th century than it has so far this century. Should this oscillation reassume a dominant role in the future, argue the researchers, it will likely increase the predictability of large-scale changes in Earth’s surface temperatures.

Abstract

The temporary slowdown in large-scale surface warming during the early 2000s has been attributed to both external and internal sources of climate variability. Using semiempirical estimates of the internal low-frequency variability component in Northern Hemisphere, Atlantic, and Pacific surface temperatures in concert with statistical hindcast experiments, we investigate whether the slowdown and its recent recovery were predictable. We conclude that the internal variability of the North Pacific, which played a critical role in the slowdown, does not appear to have been predictable using statistical forecast methods. An additional minor contribution from the North Atlantic, by contrast, appears to exhibit some predictability. While our analyses focus on combining semiempirical estimates of internal climatic variability with statistical hindcast experiments, possible implications for initialized model predictions are also discussed.

Citation

Mann, M. E.B. A. SteinmanS. K. MillerL. M. FrankcombeM. H. England, and A. H. Cheung (2016), Predictability of the recent slowdown and subsequent recovery of large-scale surface warming using statistical methods.; Geophysical Research Letters, doi:10.1002/2016GL068159, 2016.

Source

American Geophysical Union’s EOS

1 Comment on "Mann Paper: Pause Was Not Foreseeable"

  1. But it was predictable, if you used externally driven climate mechanisms.

    http://astroclimateconnection.blogspot.com.au/2016/03/there-is-natural-gleissberg-like-cycle.html

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*